Wednesday 3 October 2012

The first rant

Our first EP, recorded in 2005 under the name 'Sydney Uni Evangelical Union Annual Conference Band 2004', included this rant about emotion and music. It's interesting (to me at least) to reflect back on how much things have or haven't changed. Here it is, from the liner notes of GH1:

Why are we so afraid of emotion in our worship music? Well produced but unbiblical music can give us a "spiritual experience" without spiritual reality: we feel close to God without the need for the accessories (like God's word and obedience). But given those dangers we good evangelicals seem to have decided, recently I think, to ration out our emotion in conservatively levelled teaspoons rather than risk losing our hold on the word. This makes sense, given that words are immune from abuse, whereas emotion is strange and usually bad.

Except we know the ‘given’ is rubbish. The pulpit can also easily lull us into error, be it idle complacency or even wholesale false belief. Compared to the minefield of oral theology with its tactful qualifications and reassuring retranslations of the NIV, the hazards of emotion seem easily navigable. It's hard to think of a case where a person who has passed from death to life can go wrong with Joy. If we are happy, then we should sing songs of praise (Jas 5:13). Done. We can be serious about the word, and excited beyond verbal expression about it’s consequences at the same time.

Songs are not memory aids. Nor are they declaratory statements of truth put to music. They certainly are meant to edify us, but unlike anthems and war cries they are sung to a true and living God. Likewise thankfulness is not the only reason we sing. In the first place we sing because God is God, and is worthy of our worship and praise even before we get to the specifics. Singing is a very important way we worship God. Hebrews 13:15 exhorts us to “through Jesus… continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise–the fruit of lips that confess his name”. Not that praise or sacrifices of any kind can make us right with God, but that being made right with God we can happily fulfil our purpose in creation: to bring glory to God, and to honour Him in everything.

Songs teach us, but they teach us best when they speak to our hearts. It is the language of feelings, yes, but feelings with the depth which only comes from the solid grounding of truth. Very often songs tell us what we have known since Sunday school, but with a freshness and immediacy that cuts straight to our hearts. “Rock of Ages cleft for me" is impossible to sing without someone crying. The melody is pretty. It is poetry, by which I mean it opens up meaning with an elegant few words. But it’s the truth which brings the tears. Good songs should be written as songs. Everyone knows the difference between prose and poetry, song lyrics and deductive reasoning. We often look to the epistles for verbatim musical texts. It's not wrong. But it often makes weird songs (‘therefore’ is not a musical word). Your love Oh Lord almost didn't make the Ancon bus because we worried about lines like "shadow of Your wings". God doesn't have wings, we reasoned, and the symbolism just pushed too many "pentie" buttons for a meaty evangelical conference. Then we realised that line appears in every second psalm, felt a bit silly, and decided our buttons might need repositioning.

Finally, good worship music should be as singable as the best hymns. Who wants to sing at church like a self conscious teeny-bopper might sing to the radio? Musically it is a completely different kettle of worms. Behold the Lamb of God is still alive and rocking EU camps 15 years on because it's not written as a pop song, it's written as a church song. And that means rock solid melody. Love it or hate it, you can’t forget it…




No comments:

Post a Comment